AI & Intelligent Systems
We help decide which processes are worth automating with AI, then build them: retrieval over your own documents, assistants with proper access control, and agents whose actions a person can review.
Explore AI engineeringArchitecture and hands-on engineering for AI, data, and cloud systems.
We help organizations in Belgium and across Europe decide what to build, then build it with their own teams: data platforms on Databricks, Kubernetes platforms on AWS and Azure, and AI workflows that make it past the pilot.
An AI assistant is only as good as the data it reads, and that data is only as reliable as the platform it runs on. We work on all three layers, so a problem in one is not left for another team to find.
We help decide which processes are worth automating with AI, then build them: retrieval over your own documents, assistants with proper access control, and agents whose actions a person can review.
Explore AI engineeringWe design and build data platforms on Databricks, AWS and Azure, starting from the definitions people argue about. Data contracts, tested pipelines, and a named owner for every dataset.
Explore Data engineeringWe build and harden cloud and Kubernetes platforms on AWS, Azure and OpenShift, with infrastructure in Terraform, recovery that has been tested, and on-call ownership that is written down.
Explore Cloud engineeringBefore any build: an independent view on the decision itself. Architecture reviews, platform selection, AI strategy, and roadmaps.
Six situations that come up again and again. Most engagements start with one of them, scoped to a single team or system.
Invoices, claims, or support tickets that people copy between systems by hand. We automate the routine steps and leave the judgment calls to people.
Moving workloads out of a data center, or tidying up a cloud estate that grew faster than anyone planned, including the bill.
Help for on-call engineers: pull together the relevant logs, metrics, and runbook for an incident, and suggest a next step.
An assistant that answers from your own policies, contracts, or technical documentation, and only shows each user what they are allowed to see.
Replacing an ageing warehouse or a tangle of scripts with a lakehouse, without a big-bang cut-over.
Fewer surprises in production: health checks that mean something, alerts someone acts on, and a restore that has actually been tested.
We work inside your team rather than next to it. Every step leaves your people with something they keep, so the work is still useful if we stop after the first one.
More about how we workA few conversations with the people who own the problem and the systems. You get a short written scope: what success looks like, and what is deliberately left out.
Options with their costs and trade-offs, a recommendation, and the decisions recorded as ADRs. Assumptions we cannot verify yet are listed so they get tested early.
Working increments in your repositories and your CI, reviewed by your engineers. Tests, security checks, and monitoring ship with each increment.
Runbooks, a handover session, and at least one deploy or restore done by your team while we are still around to help.
The hard AI questions are rarely about the model. They are about which process to start with, whether the data is good enough, and who signs off on what the system does. We answer those first, then build.
How we approach AI strategyA ranked shortlist of use cases, each with a risk and a success measure. A 90-day plan with named owners. Then a first workflow in production, with the tests that show it works.
Evaluation sets, permissions, and getting from a prototype to daily use.
Contracts, safe reruns, reconciliation, and migrating without a big bang.
Health checks, failure domains, restore drills, and on-call ownership.
A few lines about the situation is enough. We reply with the questions we would ask first, and an honest view on whether we can help.